CHINA> News
![]() |
S&ED yields 'constructive' climate talks, no agreement
By Xin Zhiming (chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2009-07-28 15:56 Washington: 皇冠体育app and US conducted in-depth discussions on climate change and clean energy on the first day of high level talks here, but there was no major breakthrough or agreement, US officials said. Describing the talks as 鈥渃onstructive鈥� and 鈥渦seful鈥�, they said at a news briefing that the discussion will still help them reach an agreement in the future on carbon emissions and clean energy technology transfers.
"With respect to prospects, we鈥檙e slogging ahead. [But] I think that we will get there. I think we will end up with an agreement,鈥� he said. 鈥淚 think it鈥檚 going to come one step at a time, one meeting at a time, one conversation at a time, and not in some sudden fell swoop or sudden breakthrough.鈥� Stern said the two parties discussed financing and technology transfers that will be needed to provide assistance to developing countries so that they can start to build a low-carbon path. He also acknowledged 皇冠体育app鈥檚 commitment to the issue. 鈥淭hey (Chinese policymakers) do see this as an issue that is of very significant importance 鈥� just as a substantive matter, but also of real importance in the US-皇冠体育app bilateral relationship.鈥� In the run-up to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in December in Copenhagen, Denmark, developed and the developing countries -- including the US and 皇冠体育app -- have disagreed sharply about how they should reduce their carbon emissions. The Copenhagen conference was scheduled as a follow-up to the Kyoto Protocol. But any effective international agreement at Copenhagen will likely require an agreement between the United States and 皇冠体育app, the largest developed and developing countries respectively, first. The United States has argued that 皇冠体育app must dramatically reduce the growth rate of its emissions for any climate change agreement to be meaningful. However, 皇冠体育app has resisted, arguing that, as a developing country, it needs to keep its economy growing and raise national living standards. Moreover, Chinese officials say, strict limits on Chinese emissions would be unfair, since the country鈥檚 per capita emissions are far lower than those in the United States. They also point out that the United States and other industrialized nations are responsible for most of the carbon dioxide emitted since the Industrial Revolution, and therefore have a larger obligation to curb their own emissions before developing countries. "The issues are difficult,鈥� Stern said. |