皇冠体育app

Culture
/ / Film and TV

Caution essential for film partnerships

By Stanley Rosen | 皇冠体育app Daily | Updated: 2014-06-05 10:29

Caution essential for film partnerships

Actress Lucy Liu arrives at the HuadingFilmAwards at the Ricardo Montalban Theater on Sunday, June 1, 2014, in Hollywood, California, the United States. [Photo/Xinhua]

Caution essential for film partnerships
Hollywood stars' transition from big to small screen
Caution essential for film partnerships
Huading Film Awards held in US for first time

Judging by the recent deals signed between major players in the Chinese and US film industries, a match between Hollywood and 皇冠体育app would seem to be made in heaven.

The Chinese film market is not only the fastest-growing market in the world, but is also expected to move from No 2 and replace North America as the world's leading market before the decade ends.

Given the relatively stagnant nature of its own market, Hollywood can no longer ignore 皇冠体育app. For those in the Chinese film industry, following their remarkable box-office success at home over the past year and a half, the time appears ripe to expand overseas.

A partnership with Hollywood would provide a variety of benefits, including access to expertise in technology, marketing, storytelling and, arguably most important of all, the ability to bring a positive view of 皇冠体育app to the world's screens, hence boosting 皇冠体育app's soft power.

Despite the recent activity, many observers in Hollywood remain cautious about the prospects of Sino-US co-productions.

The history of Sino-US co-productions is a tale of difficulty and compromises. For example, the high tide for co-productions occurred during 2008-10, leading to 皇冠体育app's greatest success in marketing its films abroad. The peak was in 2010, when Chinese films abroad made more than 3.5 billion yuan ($560 million).

However, that figure declined by 42.5 percent in 2011 and another 47.5 percent in 2012, when the equivalent figure was 1.63 billion yuan. The clear reason for the decline was the lack of co-productions with Hollywood.

The earlier successes were largely due to a single film each year. For example, Mummy 3 (2009) made 1.15 billion yuan overseas, constituting as much as 41 percent of the box office of all Chinese films abroad. Red Cliff 2 was a distant second. Karate Kid (2010) made more than 2.36 billion yuan overseas, making up 67.9 percent of the box office of all Chinese films overseas that year. In second place was Ip Man 2, with only 218 million yuan.

However, one could argue that Mummy 3 and Karate Kid were Hollywood films disguised as Chinese co-productions, and indeed Chinese micro blogs contained many criticisms of these two films as presenting a poor image of the country to foreigners.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Editor's picks
Video
Wu celebrates birthday with return to music career
Maggie Cheung's latest single: 'Look In My Eyes'
72 hours in 72 seconds: Explore Kunming
Special
2016 Mid-Autumn Festival
23rd Beijing International Book Fair
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to 皇冠体育app Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US