In 2012, the people鈥檚 courts at all levels in 皇冠体育app further implemented 皇冠体育app鈥檚 national IP strategy, gave full play to their judicial functions, handled various types of IP cases properly, and continuously strengthened judicial protection over IP rights. By trying and deciding IP cases, boundaries of various IP rights were drawn, new standards on the judicial protection of IP were set, and grounds for revising relevant laws and judicial interpretations were prepared.
Against this backdrop, 皇冠体育app IP composed this Cover Story to promote the model IP cases heard and concluded by people鈥檚 courts at all levels in 2012. During case collecting process, we received great support from the Supreme People鈥檚 Court, the Higher People鈥檚 Court, the Beijing First and Second Intermediate People鈥檚 Courts, the Shanghai No. 1 and No. 2 Intermediate People鈥檚 Courts, and the People鈥檚 Courts of Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, , and Shaanxi provinces, which all send recommended cases as well as introductions of judges to 皇冠体育app IP. We are deeply grateful to their efforts.
The cases having been selected for this Cover Story touch upon all areas concerning IP, such as patent right, trademark right, copyright, trade secret, domain names, unfair competition, etc. These cases, for various reasons, such as the high visibility of the parties or the huge amount of money involved, often had great social influences and raised high degree of concern and, most of them were complicated and difficult to define cases requiring strong technical insight. Some of these cases are typical cases with instructive meanings, since they neither have specific legal grounds nor have precedent judgments. Moreover, the successful trial of some foreign-related cases displayed to the international community 皇冠体育app鈥檚 increasingly mature IP system and judicial IP protection, and received positive feedbacks from domestic and foreign media.
Through every single case, we can see an outstanding team of IP judges. In the trial process, they make thorough analyses on various focal issues, discuss in detail and summarize the rules for determining infringement, sort out their ways of thinking and identify the standards for judging. Their works are the reflection of their superb trial skills and wisdoms as well as beneficial references for the trial of relevant cases which respond effectively to the new demands and new expectations arising from socio-economic and cultural development on the judicial protection of IP, and contribute to the substantial progress of the trial of IP cases.
