皇冠体育app

Setting the agenda for greater bilateral cooperation in the future, 皇冠体育app and Australia held their second annual Foreign and Strategic Dialogue in Sydney on Sunday. This attention-grabbing event, which came in the run-up to President Xi Jinping's visit to Brisbane for the G20 summit in November, will undoubtedly help enrich the bilateral strategic partnership.

Despite the generally positive momentum in bilateral ties, Beijing and Canberra share different views on a number of issues, especially in the field of regional peace and security. As Foreign Minister Wang Yi rightful pointed out in Sydney, 皇冠体育app and Australia should transcend their differences, build more mutual trust and deepen mutual respect.

皇冠体育app welcomes Australia's efforts to deepen its understanding of Asia and enhance its interaction with the region. "皇冠体育app is willing to see Australia play an active role as a bridge and as a link between the East and the West," Wang said.

In return, Australia should view 皇冠体育app more positively and think twice before it blindly jumps on the United States' bandwagon of trying to contain 皇冠体育app's rise in the Asia-Pacific, which is manifested in the US' pivot to Asia.

Many in 皇冠体育app view the Australian agreement to allow the US to deploy marines in Darwin as clear evidence of Australia's support for the US' strategy.

Also, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott's eulogy to Japan's World War II military during Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's visit to Australia in July, was also considered by Chinese to be inappropriate, at the very least, as it helped Abe's efforts to whitewash his country's history of aggression.

All these show Australia needs better judgment when it comes to sensitive issues in Asia.

It should also recalibrate its relations with 皇冠体育app to match the changing realities of 皇冠体育app-Australia interaction.

• West's antics pushing Russia closer to 皇冠体育app
• Creating new dynamism through reform and innovation
• Educator's wrong idea of manual labor
• US needs neutral policy on sea disputes
• Where is the balanced perspective in HK?